On Spohn's rule for revision of beliefs

نویسنده

  • Prakash P. Shenoy
چکیده

This paper is about Spohn’s theory of epistemic beliefs. The main ingredients of Spohn’s theory are (i) a functional representation of an epistemic state called a disbelief function, and (ii) a rule for revising this function in light of new information. The main contribution of this paper is as follows. First, we provide a new axiomatic definition of an epistemic state and study some of its properties. Second, we study some properties of an alternative functional representation of an epistemic state called a Spohnian belief function. Third, we state a rule for combining disbelief functions that is mathematically equivalent to Spohn’s belief revision rule. Whereas Spohn’s rule is defined in terms of the initial epistemic state and some features of the final epistemic state, the rule of combination is defined in terms of the initial epistemic state and the incremental epistemic state representing the information gained. Fourth, we state a rule of subtraction that allows one to recover the addendum epistemic state from the initial and final epistemic states. Fifth, we study some properties of our rule of combination. One distinct advantage of our rule of combination is that besides belief revision, it also can be used to describe an initial epistemic state for many variables when this information is given as several independent epistemic states each involving few variables. Another advantage of our reformulation is that we can show that Spohn's theory of epistemic beliefs shares the essential abstract features of probability theory and the Dempster-Shafer theory of belief functions. One implication of this is that we have a ready-made algorithm for propagating disbelief functions using only local computation.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Belief revision generalized: A joint characterization of Bayesís and Je§reyís rules

We present a general framework for representing belief-revision rules and use it to characterize Bayesís rule as a classical example and Je§reyís rule as a non-classical one. In Je§reyís rule, the input to a belief revision is not simply the information that some event has occurred, as in Bayesís rule, but a new assignment of probabilities to some events. Despite their di§erences, Bayesís and J...

متن کامل

Belief revision generalized: A joint characterization of Bayess and Je¤reys rules

We present a general framework for representing belief-revision rules and use it to characterize Bayes’s rule as a classical example and Je¤rey’s rule as a non-classical one. In Je¤rey’s rule, the input to a belief revision is not simply the information that some event has occurred, as in Bayes’s rule, but a new assignment of probabilities to some events. Despite their di¤erences, Bayes’s and J...

متن کامل

Belief revision generalized: A joint characterization of Bayes' and Jeffrey's rules

We present a general framework for representing belief-revision rules and use it to characterize Bayes’s rule as a classical example and Je¤rey’s rule as a non-classical one. In Je¤rey’s rule, the input to a belief revision is not simply the information that some event has occurred, as in Bayes’s rule, but a new assignment of probabilities to some events. Despite their di¤erences, Bayes’s and J...

متن کامل

A Unied Characterization of Belief-Revision Rules

This paper characterizes several belief-revision rules in a uni…ed framework: Bayesian revision upon learning some event, Je¤rey revision upon learning new probabilities of some events, Adams revision upon learning some new conditional probabilities, and ‘dual-Je¤rey’revision upon learning a new conditional probability function. Despite their di¤erences, these revision rules can be characterize...

متن کامل

Revising Non-Monotonic Rule-Based Belief Databases

The update of a belief database with disjunctive knowledge which is contradictory with the beliefs of an agent poses some problems when we want to perform belief-revision with minimal changes. We define a representation of beliefs based on rules. Clauses have already been used to represent beliefs. We combine them with defaults, which allows a simple treatment of disjunctive beliefs. The behavi...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Int. J. Approx. Reasoning

دوره 5  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 1991